Sunday, May 26 2019
appstore GooglePlay
windows store
bari chievoverona40 Florentine florentia50 juve milan40 Mozzanica orobica40 roma40 sassuolo tava hellas verona40
iten

THE CGF WELCOMES THE COMPLAINT OF THE NET.UNO AND HAS THE REPETITION OF THE COMPETITION AGAINST JESINA

star inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactive


cgfThe Federal Court of Justice, today, accepts the appeal of the company Net.Uno Venezia Lido against the decision of the Sporting Judge on the tender with Jesina, cancels the contested decision with the CU nr. 65 of the 12 / 03 / 2014 and arranges the repetition of the game. It is difficult to understand why, often, the decisions of the GS, challenged subsequently by the companies with appeals, are overturned by the Federal Court of Justice. Mysteries of sports justice ...
The company Jesina had filed a complaint to the GS for the lack of dispute in the home game of the Venetians and the same GS, after carefully evaluating each documentation, had decided the following:

DECISIONS OF THE SPORTS JUDGE: race of the 23 / 2 / 2014 NET.UNO VENEZIA LIDO - EDP JESINA FEMALE
The Sporting Judge; firstly, it is noted that the company Net.Uno Venezia has formally presented a pre-announcement and has sent a related complaint. Even though this procedure appears to be unusual, by covering the aforementioned deed of defense, the decision is taken by examining all the acts produced.



The Jesina Femminile Society has also received the complaint in question, regularly produced in the terms, with which it requests that the defendant be held responsible for the non-dispute of the meeting, not started by the referee because of the wrong marking of the lines that delimit the ground of play, which in the judgment of the referee, would have made it impossible to dispute the race.
In the supplement to the report the referee clearly states that he immediately perceived irregularities in the playing field as soon as he arrived at the playing field, both for the different and different dimensions of the lines and for being the same ones traced in a non linear way. , and immediately gave notice to the accompanying manager of the host society; stating that this was impossible to dispute the race. The accompanying manager represented the difficulties encountered in the work of marking the lines and both "due to lack of suitable means" and "organizational problems" linked to those who manage the field of
game. The company Net.Uno Venezia sent memory claiming the absence of responsibility as the plant is owned by the municipality of Venice and is given to other companies; he also claimed that as soon as he received the report from the arbitrator, the company was actively working to correct the irregularities in question and that these irregularities were to be considered due to the adverse weather conditions of the previous days. Finally it was necessary to have succeeded in order to have regularized the signatures of the playing field, so that both the hosted company and the referee would have been
willing to dispute the race. The conclusions presented by the host company are not worthy of acceptance. The referee, in fact, although he acknowledged that the host company had worked with the active intervention of all the staff present, underlined how it was not possible to correct the irregularity, despite having waited for the maximum regulatory time. The discrepancy of the statements made by the accompanying manager, present at the playing field and those contained in the defensive memory must also be highlighted. Furthermore, the referee makes no mention of the conditions of the pitch for events
weather. It seems incontrovertible, vice versa, that the instruments necessary to restore their regularity were not present at the field of play.
In conclusion, the referee, in the report and the supplement to which reference must be made to decide the dispute in question, specifies that until his arrival at the playing field the signatures presented irregularities, which persisted despite the efforts of the employees of the companies that by any means and for a long time have tried in vain to restore the regularity
PQM to dissolve the reserve referred to in 62 CU of 26.2.2014 decides:
- to accept the appeal and for the purposes of art. 17 comma 1CGS, declares the company Net.Uno Venezia Lido directly responsible for the non-dispute of the meeting with consequent comminatory of the sports penalty of the loss of the race with the score of 0-3 as well as the penalty of a point in the standings;
- nothing is due for this complaint.

Walter Pettinati
Author: Walter PettinatiWebsite: www.pettinati.comEmail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Editor
Founder and Editor of calciodonne.it

Category

Author

No Results Found

Search for Articles

keyword

Category

Author

Dates:

calciodonne252

Journalist registered with the Court of Florence, n. 6032 of 15 September 2016, with director Giancarlo Padovan owned by Pettinati Editore.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter. Do not miss any news or stories.

We do not spam!