Monday, 17th October 2016
bari empoli40 Florentine florentia sangimi40 inter40 juve milan40 orobica40 roma40 sassuolo tava hellas verona40
iten

Sports Justice

star inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactive

The Romagna society awaiting the motivations to decide the countermoves. In addition to insult the damage!
We are curious to see the conclusion of this story that has left us perplexed, even considering the lack of motivation of the Department that continues to ignore the press and sports

star inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactivestar inactive

cgfThe Federal Court of Justice, today, accepts the appeal of the company Net.Uno Venezia Lido against the decision of the Sporting Judge on the tender with Jesina, cancels the contested decision with the CU nr. 65 of the 12 / 03 / 2014 and arranges the repetition of the game. It is difficult to understand why, often, the decisions of the GS, challenged subsequently by the companies with appeals, are overturned by the Federal Court of Justice. Mysteries of sports justice ...
The company Jesina had filed a complaint to the GS for the lack of dispute in the home game of the Venetians and the same GS, after carefully evaluating each documentation, had decided the following:

Page 1 of 3

Category

Author

No Results Found

Search for Articles

keyword

Category

Author

Date

calciodonne252

Journalist registered with the Court of Florence, n. 6032 of 15 September 2016, with director Giancarlo Padovan owned by Pettinati Editore.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter. Do not miss any news or stories.

We do not spam!